
By Ellen Messmer
Guardium’s S-GATE blocks privileged users based on detailed controls, rather than simply flagging activities with a warning to the security manager. A number of publicized data breach disclosures linked to insider attacks, including the one made by the Certegy division of Fidelity National Information Services last year, have highlighted the damage that a rogue database administrator can do through abuse of power. Guardium’s add-on to its S-TAP software, dubbed S-GATE, runs on any database server.
By Byron Acohido, The Last Watchdog
The disclosure of Operation Aurora last month and the outing of the Kneber botnet gang’s stolen booty this week have much in common.
Both involved nothing-out-of-the-ordinary cyberattacks that quixotically rose above the din to grab international headlines.
The mainstream attention is welcomed. It helps to underscore how the Internet underground has advanced to the point where a plethora of powerful hacking tools and services is readily available to novice hackers and elite crime gangs alike – with prices to fit every budget.
In Operation Aurora, Chinese hackers sent targeted messages to specific senior managers at 30 corporations luring them to click on a corrupted Web link. Clicking on the link activated a hacking tool designed to tap into a fresh zero-day vulnerability in Internet Explorer browser. The crooks likely paid $5,000 or maybe more for this cutting-edge malicious code.
Such zero-day attacks have long become commonplace, of course. The template for zero-day attacks dates back to December 2005, and the antics of the Russian iframeCash.biz gang, led by Andrej Sporaw. The enterprising Sporaw and company flushed out a fresh zero-day hole in a Windows operating system component, called Windows metaframe file, and began exploiting the WMF hole to launch pop-up ads for early versions of scareware.
In the Chinese zero-day attack last month, one of the targeted corporations happened to be Google — in a mood to complain. The search giant cried foul, igniting an international brouhaha over how China does business. Corporations are having a difficult time keeping up.
“Most organizations do not have the continuous, real-time monitoring in place to detect this type of activity,” says Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at IBM’s Guardium subsidiary. “Many of them still focus on defending network perimeters … others focus exclusively on meeting compliance checklists, forgetting that the true mission of security teams is to protect high-value corporate data.”
by Byron Acohido, USA TODAY
The Internet underground has advanced to the point where anyone with $325, average computer skills and a stomach for larceny can begin to amass a trove of corporate data like the one plundered in 30 days from 2,411 large organizations worldwide.
Shell out $25 and you can hire a spamming specialist to send out email lures to 250,000 people enticing them to click on a corrupted Web link that will infect their PCs with your free copy of ZeuS. Spend a bit more, and you can customize your viral spam to spread to via Facebook messages and Twitter microblogs. The only other thing you need to do is shell out $300 to rent an Internet-connected server to collect and store the harvested account logons that your bots will obediently harvest…
It was one of these type of servers that NetWitness tracked down and accessed in late January. NetWitness’ report on what it found—68,000 account logons stolen from 75,000 botted PCs in corporate networks—drew big headlines in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times.
Corporations are having a difficult time keeping up. “Most organizations do not have the continuous, real-time monitoring in place to detect this type of activity,” says Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at IBM’s Guardium subsidiary. “Many of them still focus on defending network perimeters ... others focus exclusively on meeting compliance checklists, forgetting that the true mission of security teams is to protect high-value corporate data.”
By Lindsey Siegriest, Credit Union Times
Recently, thousands of employees at the Iowa racing and gaming commission had records with their names, birth dates and social security numbers compromised when a hacker broke into the commission’s server. According to early reports, the breach was caused by changes in configuration.
Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium, said that criminals now have automated tools that allow them to search for vulnerable Web sites. Maloof added that over the last six to 18 months the trend has been to target smaller companies and institutions.
Neray said for smaller institutions, like credit unions, that may not have the manpower to dedicate to detailed monitoring than technology is the answer. “Technology can automate the monitoring processes and analysis so it reduces the need for more people and also address compliance challenges. Having someone manually assembles compliance reports is a huge burden and technology can streamline that.”
Neray cited a recent breach a regional bank in Texas were criminals made transfers to accounts in Europe. “You need to go beyond the traditional firewalls. A larger bank has controls in place that would prevent those types of transactions from happening.”
By Brian Prince, eWeek
An analysis of data breaches by Trustwave found just 9 percent were uncovered internally by the companies’ that were breached. The report mirrors other studies, and underscores the importance of having visibility into your IT environment as well as being able to correlate disparate events on a network.
You might expect an enterprise to be the first to notice its records had been breached. But as a report from Trustwave illustrates, that is rarely the case.
According to a study of more than 200 data breaches that occurred in 2009, Trustwave found that just nine percent were uncovered by the organization that was attacked. The vast majority – 80 percent – were discovered by credit card companies with access to the breached organization’s data. According to security pros, the reasons for this vary, but come down to the ability of businesses to understand and correlate the massive amounts of data at their fingerprints.
Many organizations spend too much time and effort creating database compliance and auditing reports using homegrown scripts, native logs, triggers and stored procedures, said Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at IBM’s Guardium. This isn’t an effective way to detect breaches, he explained, because it’s not real-time and the massive amounts of transaction log data produced by database environments make it easy to miss an incident or connect the dots between events.
“This is (also) costing them time and money, especially in heterogeneous environments, where each database platform—Oracle, SQL Server, DB2, etc.—requires its own handcrafted approach,” he said.
Banks Asks Court to Declare Security Measures ‘Reasonable’
Linda McGlasson, Managing Editor, Bank Info Security
A Texas bank is suing one of its commercial banking customers following an incident in which the customer lost $800,000 through fraudulent ACH transactions.
PlainsCapital Bank, a $4.4 billion bank headquartered in Dallas, has filed suit against Texas-based Hillary Machinery Inc., following a series of incidents that began last November, when cyber thieves made a series of ACH transactions that totaled $801,495 from Hillary Machinery Inc.’s bank account.
The bank was able to retrieve about $600,000 of the money, but when Hillary subsequently sent a letter requesting that the bank refund the remaining $200,000, PlainsCapital responded by filing the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuit requests that the court certify that PlainsCapital’s security was in fact reasonable, and that it processed the wire transfers in good faith. Documents filed with the court allege that the fraudulent transactions were initiated using the defendant’s valid online banking credentials.
Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy for Guardium, an IBM Company, sees the fraudsters winning the battle, as they seem to be targeting the regional banks and community bank commercial customers. “It’s a game of catch-up for those institutions that don’t have the layered protections and checks and balances across their network,” Neray says.
Existing access control, trusted context features in DB2 are not widely deployed
By Ericka Chickowski
DarkReading
As pundits ponder how IBM will leverage its acquisition of database security vendor Guardium to add more security features and functionalities to its in-house DB2 databases, now is the time for organizations to re-examine their DB2 security strategies. But many haven’t even tapped the security features they already have available in DB2.
Many organizations don’t take advantage of the existing capabilities that DB2 provides for locking down access to information, IBM executives say. Among DB2’s extant security controls, some of the most powerful features that organizations often leave untouched—to their detriment—revolve around access control. These include two biggies: utilities label-based access control (LBAC) and trusted context.
LBAC, which is designed to offer fine-grained access control, lets DB2 administrators extend controls over data that reach far beyond the simple masking of rows or columns. Administrators can use LBAC to control table objects by attaching security labels to them. Users who try to access these objects must have the corresponding security label granted to them in order to view that data.
“I think that’s one of the newer areas where, in my experience with clients, they haven’t leveraged a lot of it yet,” says Jim Lee, director of product management and strategy for IBM’s Information Management division. “I think LBAC is not commonly used today.”
Similarly, many DB2 administrators are also forgoing the platform’s ability to offer trusted context to access roles. “The thing that I see as one big glaring gap in DB2 practices, for example, [is in using] a thing called trusted content,” says Curt Cotner, IBM fellow and vice president and CTO for database servers.
Trusted content “basically gives the DBA a way to grant privileges to a role, and then applications accessing the database from the network would inherit the role based on whether they came from a trusted application server or not,” he says.
By Brian Prince, eWeek
SQL injection placed No. 3 on Verizon’s list of the 15 most common attacks in its data breach report. Preventing SQL injections can be the difference between data security and a screaming headline. Here are a few short tips on how to help protect your databases and applications.
On Dec. 6, a researcher posted proof that he had compromised NASA Websites via a SQL injection. Fortunately for NASA, his motive appears to only have been to illustrate weaknesses in its sites.
Other entities, however, have not been so lucky. There were of course the breaches of Heartland Payment Systems and Hannaford Brothers, but also mass compromises affecting thousands of Websites.
For all the security tools on the market, SQL injection placed No. 3 on Verizon’s list of the 15 most common security attacks (PDF) in its latest data breach report, issued Dec. 9.
“The key issue is educating Web developers about how to build secure applications,” said Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium, now an IBM company.
By Ericka Chickowski, CRN
The acquisition is a big validation of the database activity monitoring (DAM) market, which has managed to maintain healthy traction within the channel even in the down market.
IBM announced plans to acquire database security vendor Guardium for what some sources have pinned at $225 million.
The acquisition is a big validation of the database activity monitoring (DAM) market, which has managed to maintain healthy traction within the channel even in the down market.
“These products play a critical role in establishing a 360-degree capability to monitor the security of critical applications. The healthy valuation Guardium seems to have drawn reflects the importance of real-time, application-centric security monitoring,” says Alison Andrews, CEO of Vigilant, a New York-based Guardium partner. “As security monitoring has become significantly more multi-layered and complex, resources that can be assigned to the task are finite. In this environment, its critical to focus monitoring efforts directly on the assets that matter most to the business.”
According to IBM officials, Big Blue was drawn to Guardium for its ability to not only help customers monitor IBM database systems, but also keep tabs across platforms.
“This marks a significant expansion in our ability to help our clients monitor and govern data in multiplatform environments,” says Arvind Krishna, general manager, IBM Information Management. “Structured information is at the center of many business transformations and the integrity of data is critical if an organization is going to use information as a strategic assets. This cross platform support is critical for our and is a key competitive differentiator for IBM.”
By Janine Milne, CBR
Q: What are the particular issues with database security?
A: The problems T-Mobile had recently [where one or more employees sold private customer details to third parties] show how there’s a lot of pressure to get more control over users. We’re hoping government will put stronger controls in place about data protection. If database administrators are corrupt, then they have complete power over data. The fact that T Mobile was unaware of the problem should be unacceptable.
We’ve seen a number of other cases where data has been sold. For example, there was a case of health information stolen from a private doctor on Harley Street, who had outsourced database management and that company outsourced again to India where a database administrator sold the data. A lot of companies are asking their outsourcers to prove what their staff are doing.
Q: What singles you out from other players in the market?
A: What we provide is like an IPS (intrusion prevention system) for databases – it’s like putting a firewall around a database. There are a set of rules that control access to the database even for privileged users. Everything can be built into the rule set. The software is real-time, so security faults are flagged immediately.
There are a lot of other players in security, but few in database security that do what we do in the way we do it. We control the centre – the database access management and control – and there are few competitors in that space. We are real-time and have 100% connection between users and actions in the database. Often applications people pool IDs and then it’s very difficult to track one individual user. So from a SOX (Sarbanes Oxley) or PCI compliance perspective, if you need to absolutely track users’ activity, you can do it against set of rules. We can group users or go down to an individual level, whereas other companies don’t go down to the individual level.
Dan Raywood
The hacking of a police website earlier this week is indicative of a lack of secure website development.
Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy for Guardium, claimed that SQL injection is a big problem worldwide, and restricted budgets mean organisations are unable to hire the most sophisticated web developers, which results in security flaws like SQL injection.
The Durham police website was hacked earlier this week with messages posted protesting over terrorist-related deaths in Pakistan. A spokesperson for Durham police told BBC News that an investigation was now under way and the ‘offending matter’ was being removed by computer specialists. A spokesman said: “We are aware of a problem with the force website and the offending matter is being removed. An investigation into how this occurred is under way.”
Neray said: “Since it’s now fairly easy to download automated toolkits for finding these flaws, almost anyone can perform these attacks, including politically-minded cybervandals.
“In the case of the Durham Police attack, it’s more of an embarrassment and a nuisance, but now you see how organised crime uses the same approach to loot websites for hundreds of thousands of credit card numbers, which they can then sell on the open market for anywhere from 7 to 70 Euros per card. That’s the real threat from cyberattacks like SQL injection.”
BY JILL R. AITORO
Two Senate measures would regulate how both public and private sector organizations protect personal information and respond to data breaches, but the real impact of any federal standards will depend on whether they pre-empt existing state laws.
The Data Breach Notification Act, introduced in January by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would authorize the attorney general to bring civil actions against firms that failed to notify people whose personal information had been compromised in a breach and would extend notification requirements to government agencies. The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, introduced in July by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., also would set notification requirements and tighter criminal penalties for identity theft and willful concealment of a breach, and would require businesses to implement preventive security standards to guard against threats to their databases.
Both bills cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee and have been placed on the calendar for consideration by the full Senate.
State and federal measures stem from numerous high-profile data breaches in recent years, including the exposure of the personal information of 26.5 million veterans in 2006, after a laptop was stolen from a contractor’s home. The fear in such instances is that personal information will be used for identity theft or financial fraud.
“A federal breach notification law would force management to put budget and controls in place” in both government and industry, said Phil Neray, vice president of strategy at database security company Guardium. “Most organizations are driven by what they have to do, not what they should do.”
The Office of Management and Budget requires federal agencies to notify individuals in the event of a breach of their personal information. But a patchwork of state laws dictate how other public and private organizations should handle breaches of sensitive information. Forty-seven states plus the District of Columbia, New York City and Puerto Rico have their own laws, which vary widely.
California was the first state to pass a law requiring companies to disclose when unencrypted personal information in their databases has been accessed by someone who isn’t authorized to view it. It’s also one of only a handful of states that incorporated a broader definition of personal information into legislation that includes not only name, Social Security number, driver’s license number and financial data, but also health information, which hackers can use to file fraudulent insurance claims or acquire prescription medications to sell on the black market.
Massachusetts also included as a supplement to its 2007 data breach notification law (MGL Chapter 93H) a series of data security requirements that government and industry must follow to protect the personal information of state residents. Among the requirements, which go into effect in March 2010, are encryption of laptops and portable devices and security training programs.
This is a good example of why a federal standard is needed, Neray said.
“Most organizations are national and international. To have to hire lawyers to study differences in the laws and define what they have to do in each state doesn’t make sense from a cost or efficiency point of view,” he said. “I’d hope any federal regulation would pre-empt state laws, because it would be the more business friendly approach. You can argue about how much regulation should be imposed on businesses, but this is not a value-based issue, it’s a national issue.
ComputerWeekly.com
By Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy, Guardium
Job hunting is a tough job in itself. Battling with eight percent unemployment, rehearsing for job interviews, adding relevant yet interesting hobbies to your CV...and then you receive an email from The Guardian’s jobsite to say that your personal details may have been stolen in a “deliberate and sophisticated” attack, and that you ought to get yourself registered with the UK’s fraud prevention service, CIFAS.
But this is what happened to thousands of job hunters just last week. The personal data of more than 500,000 users was accessed and stolen from the website http://jobs.guardian.co.uk, one of the most popular jobsites in Britain with more than ten million unique users. Managed by third-party job board software supplier Madgex, the cracked database contained names, email addresses, covering letters and CVs. Other details, including passwords and financial data, were reportedly not breached.
Modern day criminals want our data: credit, financial, personal. There’s a strong black market in each, and identity thieves are more inventive than ever. The cost of identity theft to the UK economy is estimated to be £1.2 billion annually. Every year we share more of ourselves online: a trend that’s set to continue as we spend more money on ecommerce sites, share details of our lives across multiple social media platforms, and even job hunt online. Each time we do any of these things, we place our data and our faith in commercial databases: Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, Sybase, MySQL and the overarching security measures taken by businesses that own these databases.
While Scotland Yard’s e-Crime unit gets on the case, The Guardian breach has alerted IT and security managers of the need to protect their user data and to consider data security from every angle. Most have already spent time, money and valuable resources securing their network perimeters with firewalls and anti-virus software, and even protecting their laptops with hard disc encryption and DLP solutions. It’s a necessary step, but one which can also be guilty of generating a false sense of security.
So how was The Guardian’s data accessed? Well, all fingers point to an SQL injection vulnerability, a method currently in favour with hackers and data thieves. SQL injection attacks exploit vulnerabilities at the Web application layer to access sensitive data in back-end databases. These web-based attacks pass undetected through firewalls and other perimeter defences including IDS (intrusion detection) and IPS (intrusion prevention) systems, then hijack the application server to gain access to underlying database records.
This threat is rising. In 2008, the number of SQL injection attacks leapt by a staggering 134% to several hundred thousand occurring each day. And according to a data breach report published by the Verizon Business RISK team, seventy-five percent of all breached records came from compromised database servers - while other IT assets such as laptops and backup tapes accounted for less than 0.05 percent of compromised data, and a staggering 90 percent involved groups identified as engaged in organised crime.
Yet databases remain vulnerable. Which prompts the question, just how many organisations are still open to this type of attack? And how many organisations simply do not understand that they are even at risk?
Until recently, identifying unauthorised or suspicious access to databases was impractical and complex. Logging all activity in the database itself significantly degrades system performance while at the same time generating massive amounts of transaction records, which creates a “needle in the haystack” problem since all of the monitoring data must then be analysed and filtered to identify anomalous activity, typically using home-grown scripts.
Thankfully, a new class of database monitoring appliance has emerged during the last few years that continuously monitors and analyses all database activities in real-time – from outside the database - without impacting database performance. These systems, which can also be implemented as virtual appliances (software-only), mitigate the risk of external and internal attacks by immediately identifying suspicious behaviour based on automated policies and continuous comparisons to baselines of normal activity. They also simplify security and compliance by providing a single integrated solution for heterogeneous environments (Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, etc.).
But why access The Guardian’s jobsite at all? The answer is the first rule of hacking: because somebody discovered that they could. It may be argued that the theft of names, email addresses, CVs and cover letters is relatively unimportant, almost unthreatening. Not so - data thieves are creative. Consumers who value the security of their personal data enough to rush out and buy shredders may not lose personal data from a rubbish bin, but does that matter if it’s there for the taking online?
The definition of sensitive data has broadened. Dates of birth, addresses, personal histories, details of daily lives – all this data is useful to a fraudster, and might be the first steps towards more complete identity theft. Businesses have to understand that any and all personal data is valuable, and that it is imperative that they ensure the public has unshakable faith in their data storage. A deliberate attack that resulted in the theft of half a million personal records from a very high profile organisation is not to be sniffed at. Any enterprise that holds any personal data needs to take every step to safeguard it. But it’s not an easy job - just ask The Guardian.
par Emmanuelle Lamandé
Guardium s’inscrit, depuis 2002, dans le domaine de la sécurité des bases de données. Présent pour la première fois aux Assises de la Sécurité, nous avons rencontré Marc Buchwald, Regional Director Southern Europe de Guardium, qui nous explique sa stratégie.
Largest Dedicated Security Technology Company Chooses Guardium to Track and Monitor All Access to Cardholder Data, Without Impacting Performance or Reliability; Solution Deployed in Less Than 48 Hours
Guardium announced that McAfee has successfully deployed Guardium’s real-time database security and monitoring solution to safeguard sensitive cardholder data in its high-volume, business-critical McAfee.com environment.
McAfee.com processes millions of credit card transactions per year for McAfee’s online stores, serving home, home office and small business consumers. The site also serves customers of McAfee’s national ISP partners such as Comcast and Cox Communications, who have strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs). It is hosted in multiple world-class, geo-separated data centers hosting large-scale, clustered database systems.
“McAfee needed a solution with continuous real-time visibility into all sensitive cardholder data “ in order to quickly spot unauthorized activity and comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) “ but given our significant transaction volumes, performance and reliability considerations were crucial,” said Tony Gunn, director of security engineering, McAfee. “We were initially using a database auditing solution that collected information from native DBMS logs and stored it in an audit repository, but granular logging significantly impacted our database servers and the audit repository was simply unable to handle the massive transaction volume generated by our McAfee.com environment.
The Guardium solution provided enterprise-class scalability in a solution and was deployed in less than 48 hours. In addition to safeguarding our customers’ trust, Guardium’s technology also automates our PCI database controls and reduces DBA workload while enforcing separation of duties to protect against both internal and external threats.”
McAfee is now expanding its Guardium implementation to protect its SAP systems for Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance, as well as to safeguard other sensitive financial databases in the corporation. The company is also integrating Guardium with its correlation engine and enterprise-wide Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platform to consolidate database security alerts and events into a single console.
Guardium’s scalable platform uses centralized, cross-DBMS policies to immediately identify unauthorized or suspicious activities in real-time, without relying on database-resident logs that add overhead and can easily be disabled or modified by hackers or privileged insiders employing anti-forensic tactics. Guardium is a founding member of the McAfee Security Innovation Alliance, and its Guardium 7 platform has been integrated with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator’ (ePO) and has been awarded the “McAfee compatible” designation. SIA is a core element of McAfee’s technology partner ecosystem, and was established in 2007 to increase the customer value of McAfee Security Risk Management (SRM) solutions.
“We’re very pleased that McAfee, the world’s largest dedicated security technology provider, has selected Guardium to safeguard their brand and consumers’ trust,” said Ram Metser, Guardium CEO. “Safeguarding enterprise databases is a critical task which requires the right architecture and a robust solution derived from ongoing feedback from the most demanding data center environments worldwide. Guardium is committed to providing practical solutions that safeguard our customers’ businesses while at the same time simplifying database security and compliance for their IT organizations.”
By Phil Neray
How many breaches in the past year were caused by someone IM’ing sensitive information or stealing data with a USB stick? I can’t think of any.
So why are so many government organizations still relying solely on traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions to protect their critical data from leakage via e-mail attachments, instant messaging and portable USB devices?
DLP alone doesn’t cut it. According to the Verizon 2009 Data Breach Investigations Report, DLP doesn’t address the highest priority risk: breaches that occur at the database layer. The report reveals that, “Although much angst and security funding is given to offline data, mobile devices, and end-user systems, these assets are simply not a major point of compromise.”
It’s easy to see why database servers have become the principal targets for criminals and rogue insiders. Not only do they contain your organization’s most sensitive and valuable information—such as personally identifiable information (PII), financial data and classified information—but penetrating databases has become markedly easier in the last 12 months.
By Dan Raywood, SC Magazine
A story about a convicted hacker who was given complete access to a prison mainframe and subsequently closed it down is reminiscent of modern business practise.
A report by the Daily Mirror claimed that a jailed hacker shut down a prison’s entire computer system after he was given the job of programming it.
It claimed that Douglas Havard, who was serving six years for stealing up to £6.5 million using forged credit cards over the internet, was approached after governors wanted to create an internal TV station but needed a special computer program written.
He was then left unguarded and hacked into the system’s hard drive at Ranby Prison in Nottinghamshire. He apparently set up a series of passwords so no one else could get into the system. He was put in segregation as punishment after having left the system crippled.
Phil Neray, VP of security strategy for Guardium, claimed that this is reminiscent of how organisations are not implementing the right monitoring controls to ensure that insiders do not abuse their privileges.
Neray said: “This is clearly a serious judgment error, in that they gave a sophisticated cybercriminal access to important computer systems. However most organisations give similar administrative access to their IT employees, developers and even to their outsourced personnel.
“The vast majority of IT insiders are not malicious, but you never know when you might encounter a rogue employee who’s having personal financial issues or is simply disgruntled. In other words, you need to ‘trust but verify’ by continuously monitoring the activities of anyone who has the ‘keys to the kingdom’.”
By Jaikumar Vijayan, Computerworld
For the second time in less than three years, a research scientist at DuPont has been accused of misappropriating trade secrets from the company and attempting to use them to build competing products in China.
In a lawsuit filed in Delaware Chancery Court, DuPont accused Hong Meng, a former senior research scientist at the company, of stealing data on a new, thin-computer display technology called “organic light emitting diode” or OLED. DuPont claims that Meng planned to use the stolen information to develop and commercialize products using OLED technology with his alma mater, Peking University, in Beijing, which is also developing similar technology.
“As indicated by our civil complaint, a recent internal investigation revealed evidence that Hong Meng was attempting to misappropriate proprietary company information,” Thomas Sager, DuPont’s general counsel, said in the statement. “Hong Meng’s employment with the company was terminated and we promptly filed suit to ensure that he not use or disclose DuPont trade secrets,” Sager said. The company its commitment to protecting the proprietary science and technology it has developed.
Too often, the focus of security efforts is on satisfying compliance requirements such as those involving the protection of credit card and other financial data, said Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium, a vendor of database protection products. “What this reminds us is that many companies have a lot of valuable data that is not covered by compliance” and, therefore, not as well protected he said.
While such thefts can be hard to stop, security controls are available at multiple layers that can help, he said. For instance, activity monitoring products can help detect suspicious activity such as a high volume of downloads involving sensitive data, or downloads that occur after hours, he said. Similarly, tools can help companies restrict the copying and downloading of certain kinds of data to USB devices, for instance, or to an e-mail account, Neray said.
By Chuck Miller, SC Magazine
Industrial manufacturing giant DuPont has sued an employee it claims was planning to smuggle trade secrets to China, according to a report this week in The News Journal of Delaware.
The employee, Hong Meng, a senior research chemist, admitted to DuPont security officials that in August he downloaded confidential company files from his company-issued laptop to an external hard drive. The data included research on organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology, said the report, citing court papers.
A database can be secure, but that doesn’t help if people with legitimate access are abusing their rights, said Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium.
“Most insiders have access to information they need to do their job,” Neray told SCMagazineUS.com. “The challenge is to be sure that you have sufficient controls in place to identify when someone is abusing their privileges.”
Most companies have policies, but what are missing are mechanisms for enforcing those policies, Neray said.
“Most of the focus has been on financial data, but what this story shows is that companies have other types of data of a proprietary nature that also must be protected,” he said. “The message is: Don’t forget about proprietary information databases.”
The theft of more than 130 million credit card numbers, for which three people were indicted Monday, was carried out by a combination of packet sniffing and SQL injection. Here are six products, looked at by the Test Center, that compromised networks might have used to ward off the intrusions.
Our data is under attack. That was made readily apparent as details emerge following the indictment of several individuals in what is being called the biggest case of credit card theft ever. How did they do it? It happened because of poor security defenses within the networks of the businesses that got hacked. These companies failed to implement strong defenses against data extraction --- data that contained millions of customer credit and debit card numbers. What’s so appalling is that there are security products out there engineered to thwart the types of security breaches that were used in this crime. Here are six products we have looked at in the Test Center that these compromised networks could have used.
Guardium 7.0 Database And Security Management Appliance
Guardium’s Database Security and Management Appliance protects against inside and external threats. Guardium’s solution prevents database compromise by offering real-time monitoring and alerting, including the monitoring of privileged user accounts such as those of database administrators. SQL injection attacks are stopped by anomaly detection.
In the event of a detected attack or data compromise, such as an SQL injection, Guardium 7.0 Database and Security Management Appliance will provide detailed monitoring of attacks, pinpointing what IP was used, what was targeted, which tables were accessed and which application was involved. Information on the users who may have been compromised is provided as well. There is also the ability to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and to mask sensitive information in tables. This solution features templates and high-level, yet easy-to-work-with, best practice reports for PCI, SOX, OMB and data privacy.
By Greg Masters, SC Magazine
Federal indictments were handed down in Washington, D.C. on Monday against three men accused of involvement in what the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) is calling the largest credit- and debit-card data breach in the United States. The men allegedly used sophisticated techniques to bypass network firewalls and penetrate the databases of several large companies, including Heartland Payment Systems, a card-payment processor; 7-Eleven, the nationwide convenience store chain; and Hannaford Brothers, a supermarket chain. The personally identifiable information (PII) of more than 130 million credit and debit card holders is believed to have been stolen.
Albert Gonzalez, 28 years old, of Miami, aka “segvec,” “soupnazi” and “j4guar17,” along with two unnamed co-conspirators, Hackers 1 and 2, residing in or near Russia, were charged with conspiracy and conspiracy to engage in wire fraud. The hackers are accused of using SQL injection attacks to get around the victims’ firewall to gain access to computers connected to the internet.
The good news is that people are getting indicted, Upesh Patel, VP, business development at Waltham, Mass.-based Guardium, a vendor of safeguards for application and database infrastructure, told SCMagazineUS.com on Tuesday. “Our security industry is fighting. We now have an avenue to funnel our concerns.”
The fact that this indictment is attracting attention in the mainstream media underscores that corporations are realizing that the database is where the crown jewels are, Patel said. The lesson to be learned here, he said, is that corporations must put a set of controls in place to monitor and secure their data.
It is no longer enough to rely merely on compliance and audits, said Patel. “The breach at Heartland could have been prevented if controls had been put in place to monitor in real time any changes taking place with the configuration files on their network. Nobody would be able to install a trojan,” he said.
By Kelly Jackson Higgins, DarkReading
Alleged mastermind behind TJX, Heartland, and Hannaford’s breaches used SQL injection, sniffers, custom backdoor malware in many of the attacks
The attacks that led to the mass theft of over 130 million credit and debit card accounts may hold the record for the biggest overall breach ever charged in the U.S., but the attackers used classic and well-known methods that could have been thwarted, according to experts.
In the wake of the big news yesterday that one man is suspected to be behind the biggest breaches ever charged in U.S. history, security experts say the indictment of 28-year-old Albert Gonzalez, aka “segvec,” “soupnazi,” and “j4guar17,” of Miami, Fla., revealed that Gonzalez and his cohorts exploited vulnerabilities that are typically found in many cybercrime cases --SQL injection, packet sniffing, and backdoor malware designed to evade detection.
The indictment (PDF) revealed that Gonzalez, who previously had been charged for his alleged role in the breach of TJX, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Barnes & Noble, and Dave & Buster’s, has now also been indicted for allegedly conspiring to break into computers and stealing credit and debit card data from Heartland Payment Systems; 7-Eleven Inc., Hannaford Brothers Co., and two other major national retailers whose names were withheld in the filing.
While the attacks appear to be phased-in and coordinated, the attackers didn’t employ any hacks that the victim organizations could not have defended against, experts say. SQL injection, for instance, is the most commonly exploited flaw in Web attacks, according to data from the Web Hacking Incident Database.
There’s no indication in the filing that the database itself was breached, but Upesh Patel, vice president of business development at Guardium, says the attackers must have exploited applications with authenticated connections to the database. “The breaches involved vast amounts of data that clearly resides in the database,” Patel says. “Since a SQL Injection attack exploits vulnerabilities in the database, the attack could have occurred from any end-user application that was accessing the database.”
By Ericka Chickowski, DarkReading
Long left out of the security picture, DBAs now find themselves performing key tasks in the enterprise
[Excerpted from The Database Administrator’s Guide To Security, a new report published today in Dark Reading’s Database Security Tech Center.]
In the past, database administrators weren’t expected to do much with security. Their focus was on the speed, performance, and accuracy of the data. Security was a relatively low priority.
Recently, however, that prioritization has begun to shift. The number of structured information stores is mushrooming within the enterprise. The value of the data increases as businesses share it with customers and partners. Regulators and auditors are taking a hard look at who has access to database information. And financially motivated hackers are salivating at the prospect of breaking into these concentrated—and potentially lucrative—repositories of data.
All of these trends are converging to form one universal truth of data protection: DBAs can no longer ignore security. Like their administrative counterparts in Windows and networking environments, DBAs must finally knuckle down and count security as a vital part of their jobs.
While the security team certainly plays a major factor in shoring up the defenses of enterprise databases, all of its work won’t help much if DBAs don’t lay the necessary risk mitigation groundwork first, experts say. In addition to improving patch management and password management practices, DBAs can help by taking the right steps in configuration management.
“Figuring out if you have the right privileges on certain tables is completely outside the scope of a network vulnerability scan,” says Phil Neray, vice president of strategy for Guardium, a database security tool vendor. “The DBAs need to go and make sure the privileges are right—not just for the items in the database, but also for files and executables outside the database.”
By Brian Prince, eWeek
Reports that companies involved in some of the latest data breaches were PCI-compliant continues to spark discussion of whether PCI is a solid measuring stick for overall security. Industry observers say yes, but businesses need to change their check-list approach. When the Network Solutions breach was reported last week, the usual buzz about whether or not the company was PCI-compliant began almost immediately.
Malware that targeted Web sites of The White House, Department of Homeland Security, the FAA, and others appears to be a MyDoom variant.
By J. Nicholas Hoover, InformationWeek
DDOS [Distributed Denial of Service] attacks have targeted the private sector for years and many companies have taken protective measures, but recent cyber attacks on Estonia and Georgia as well as this one could portend an increase in politically motivated attacks.
“It’s no longer hackers defacing Web sites to become famous,” says Phil Neray, VP of strategy at database security company Guardium. “It’s political cyberterrorism, which is a very serious threat.”
The targets included the Web sites of The White House, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as The New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, and The Washington Post.
Cybersecurity has become an increasingly high priority for the federal government, and President Barack Obama recently laid out plans to appoint a new high-level cybersecurity coordinator. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates recently said that the military had spent more than $100 million over six months responding to cyber attacks.
By William Jackson, GCN
The distributed denial-of-service attacks used networks of compromised computers called botnets to send high volumes of traffic to sites with the intention of overloading the Web servers and making the sites unavailable.
“It’s been more of a nuisance,” said Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium. “We have countermeasures for denial-of-service attacks.”
Sophisticated attacks that do not draw attention to themselves and might allow information to be quietly gathered or manipulated without the owners’ knowledge are a more serious threat than denial-of-service attacks, Neray said.
Neray called the attacks an example of political cyber terrorism probably being carried out by a nation state, although there is little evidence of the source of the attacks. Reports from South Korea earlier this year indicated that North Korea had established a cyber warfare unit. Neray said the denial-of-service attack could be another example of North Korean provocations, in line with the recent missile tests.
Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security Subcommittee, said today that the incidents highlight the need for improved cyber defenses. Carper called for passage of legislation he introduced in April — the U.S. Information and Communications Enhancement Act of 2009 (S. 921), which would rewrite the Federal Information Security Management Act [FISMA] of 2002. The legislation would enhance the power of the Homeland Security Department’s U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team to take action before a cyberattack penetrates government networks.
Computerworld UK
Getting to grips with best practices in database security and monitoring.
Things used to be simple. You could have on-site security guards and identity checks at the server room. You could stop outsiders from accessing your data by restricting physical access to the machines that process it.
In today’s web-enabled world, that’s no longer the case. To be useful, a company’s data must be connected to the internet. That exposes it to more automated and targeted attacks than ever before. Hackers are highly motivated, with crime syndicates willing to pay hard cash for personal information hacked from customer databases. Should the database be breached, a company risks financial penalties from governments and credit card companies, as well as lost competitive advantage and customer trust. But defending the business requires companies to rethink how they protect their IT infrastructures.
Breach Analysis: Highest Risk is to Online Data Versus End-User Devices
The 2009 Data Breach Investigations Report from the Verizon Business RISK Team examines 285 million records that were compromised in 2008. While much media attention and security funding have focused on lost laptops and backup tapes, the study reveals some startling statistics: only 0.05 percent (1/20th of one percent!) of breached records came from mobile devices such as USB drives, end-user systems such as laptops, and offline data. In comparison, the #1 source of breached records was database servers - which accounted for a massive 75 percent of all compromised records.
The Threat from Privileged Insiders
One of the primary threats comes from insiders. Privileged users such as database administrators (DBAs), developers and outsourced personnel typically have unfettered access to databases as part of their daily jobs. It only takes one dissatisfied employee to cause a breach. Privileged users can also disrupt business applications by making unauthorized or even accidental changes to sensitive data - bypassing formal change control processes - and in most organizations, no one would know the difference.
External Attacks: SQL Injection
According to a recent IBM report, SQL injection attacks have now become the number one web application vulnerability, increasing 134 percent in 2008. Most modern businesses use web applications, which are essentially windows into your most critical databases used by customers, partners and employees. By typing malicious code into poorly-coded web forms, hackers can steal sensitive data and even plant malware on unsuspecting users that visit vulnerable sites. This type of attack completely bypasses traditional security measures because it leverages web applications to penetrate your perimeter.
Database Activity Monitoring (DAM)
With these threats ever-present, businesses need to start protecting themselves more proactively. One way is do this is to deploy a database activity monitoring (DAM) solution. These do exactly what their name implies - they track all database activities in real time. Some also create a granular audit trail of all activities, which can’t be modified by privileged users - which is important for auditors. If unauthorized or anomalous access occurs, based on predefined policies, DAM immediately triggers a real-time alert. Some solutions can even shut down the threat before any damage occurs.
DAM solutions offer additional business benefits beyond safeguarding critical data. Many offer automation and centralization of key security controls, across multiple DBMS platforms and applications, replacing manual processes that may already be in place. This automated approach produces a significant ROI by reducing the time and cost required to both catch unauthorized access and generate the detailed compliance reports required for regulations such as PCI-DSS and European data protection laws.
by Chuck Miller, SC Magazine
A group of computer hackers based in Turkey breached the sites of two U.S. Army facilities, leveraging SQL injection attacks, according to reports.
The group, which calls itself “m0sted,” defaced the page and redirected users to pages that included anti-American and anti-Israeli statements, Information Week reported last week.
The defaced pages were set up to provide public access to the McAlester Ammunition Plant in McAlester, Okla., and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Transatlantic Center in Winchester, Va., home of the Gulf Regional Division, a division of the Army that is responsible for reconstruction projects in Iraq.
“The question of vulnerability to SQL injection attacks has come up frequently,” Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy for Guardium, told SCMagazineUS.com on Monday. “The number is rising dramatically. SQL injection is a serious threat. Not enough organizations are paying attention to it.”
by Kelly Jackson Higgins, DarkReading
User with classified data access sold Defense Department information, documents
A Department of Defense official with top-secret security clearance allegedly provided an official working for the Chinese government with classified department data and documents.
According to a Department of Justice announcement, officials have charged James Wilbur Fondren Jr., deputy director for the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) Washington Liaison Office, with espionage conspiracy for providing classified information to an agent of a foreign government. Fondren sold information to a Taiwanese-American man in the form of “opinion papers” that included classified DoD data via an at-home consulting business he ran on the side, according to the affidavit filed this week.
“This case really highlights the question a lot of people are asking themselves these days: Where is the perimeter? Or maybe there is no perimeter?” says Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy for Guardium. “The traditional perimeter of firewalls doesn’t exist [here] because the perimeter was this person. You might even say the data is the perimeter.”
This situation is the equivalent of a privileged user with inside access to sensitive information. “As part of this job, he had access to these classified documents,” Neray says. “It doesn’t appear that there were any controls in place to look for suspicious usage of those documents.”
Staff, SC Magazine
British consumers are concerned about the security of their personal and financial data.
According to a survey by Guardium, consumers were asked to share their views on the safety of their personal data from both internal and external threats across a range of organisations. Of the three types of organisation, banks emerged as the most trusted, followed by retailers and the government.
Of those surveyed, 43 per cent were worried about their bank’s ability to protect their credit cards from fraud, while 40 per cent had concerns about their bank’s ability to protect their personal data.
Almost one-fifth of the respondents had been victims of fraud, although 87 per cent of those affected had been pleased with their bank’s ability to handle the situation and provide a positive outcome.
Meanwhile consumers were more concerned about external threats – such as criminal attacks – to their banking information than internal threats, although 25 per cent said they were worried about the potential threat from rogue or disgruntled employees in the wake of the global financial crisis.
David Valovcin, vice president for Guardium, said: “Traditional perimeter defences such as firewalls and anti-virus are no longer sufficient to defend against cybercriminals who can easily bypass them with web application attacks such as SQL injection.”
by Angela Moscaritolo, SC Magazine
U.S. cyber capabilities are at least as powerful as its most sophisticated adversary, but the country needs a clear plan should it decide to unleash a digital attack of its own, according to a report from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).
The report, entitled “Technology, Policy, Law and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities,” said a number of challenges lie ahead, including developing rules for the use of cyberweapons, coordinating allied nations and public and private entities, determining the outcome of cyberattacks on enemies and dealing with the possible “significant” operational implications a cyberattack could have on the U.S. private sector.
Phil Neray, vice president of strategy at database security company Guardium, told SCMagazineUS.com that cyberattack policy is needed because of the changing nature of war. Because cyberattacks can be launched at a distance anonymously, it is conceivable that a foreign nation would launch a cyberattack instead of a more traditional attack. And for, private entities, it would be difficult to know how to respond to such an attack or how to enlist the government’s help, he said.
Guardium has added support for DB2/400 (DB2 for i) with its database security software, the company announced this month. Guardium’s software monitors all major database management systems in real time for signs of unauthorized or malicious activity from internal and external threats, such as malevolent DBAs and SQL injection attacks. The software does not affect database performance and provides another layer of protection for critical business systems on top of traditional network security tools, the company says.
“The key issue for database security is that most companies have no visibility into what’s really going on with their database,” says Phil Neray, Guardium’s vice president of marketing. “They don’t really know who’s accessing those databases, and they don’t have any mechanisms for identifying unauthorized or suspicious activity.”
Read more about how Guardium gives customers better visibility into database activities.
Weak Web Applications Increasingly Fall Prey To This Potentially Devastating Attack
As security measures in data centers become progressively more stringent, hackers are turning to more unique methods to access sensitive data. One of these is SQL injection, which replaced cross-site scripting as the predominant Web application vulnerability in 2008, according to an IBM study.
Key Points
Guardium’s Neray recommends implementing real-time database activity monitoring technology to track all SQL transactions and continuously checking for unusual or suspicious activity, such as a high volume of failed logins, an unusually high volume of queries in a given period of time, or the execution of SQL commands that are not typically executed by the organization’s Web applications.
by Chuck Miller, SC Magazine
A cyberespionage network, known as GhostNet, possibly operating out of China, is making use of malicious websites and phishing emails to take control of hundreds of sensitive government machines across 103 countries, researchers revealed this weekend.
A pair of Canadian researchers at the Munk Center for International Studies at the University of Toronto said GhostNet struck “high-value targets,” such as foreign embassies and ministries, and even a NATO network. So far, some 1,300 computers have been infected by servers that trace back to China. The researchers, Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, released their 53-page report Sunday after 10 months of investigation.
“The attacker(s) are able to exploit several infection vectors,” the researchers wrote. “First, they create web pages that contain drive-by exploit code that infects the computers of those who visit the page. Second, the attacker(s) have also shown that they engage in spear phishing in which contextually relevant emails are sent to targets with PDF and DOC attachments.”
In the spear-phishing attacks, when the attachments are downloaded, they create backdoors that “cause the infected computer to connect to a control server and await further instructions,” the researchers wrote. The compromised machines then can be directed to download and install a remote administration trojan..
“Some of the things they did indicate that they were very sophisticated,” Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy for Guardium, told SCMagazineUS.com on Monday. “The machines were told to send the data stolen using a Tor network in an encrypted form. Also, the way the trojans communicated with the command servers made use of a complex control program that enabled them to completely control users’ PCs.”
The GhostNet operation is still operating and continues to hit more than a dozen additional computers per week, according to the University of Toronto researchers.
by Byron Acohido, USA Today
Cybercriminals are spreading invisible infections far and wide across the Internet by hammering hundreds of thousands of websites each day with so-called SQL injection attacks. The trend started last summer and has continued to accelerate. IBM Internet Security Systems says it identified 50% more infected Web pages in the last three months of 2008 than it did in all of 2007.
Giant financial institutions and online merchants have put up strong defenses, says Phil Neray, vice president of security strategy at Guardium, a database security firm. “The same is not necessarily true of regional banks and credit unions, smaller online retailers and state government agencies.”
by David Mitchell, SC Magazine
Lab Review Cites “Swift Deployment, Extensive Database Support, Sophisticated Policy-Based Security, Unique S-Tap and S-Gate Probes, [and] Vulnerability Assessment Tools”
Guardium, the database security company, received 5 out of 5 stars on Features, Performance and Ease-of-Use in an extensive Guardium 7 lab review published in the April 2009 issue of SC Magazine UK.
The review states that Guardium 7 “provides essential tools to protect against the ever-increasing number of security threats” and “provides a range of security measures that allow companies to audit database usage and enforce policies to prevent unauthorized access” while providing an “intuitive web interface” that “offers a range of preconfigured interfaces for data privacy regulations and compliancy guidelines.”
The review concludes that “you have to ask yourself whether you can afford not to have [Guardium 7].”
With database attacks on the increase Guardium can make sure businesses don’t get caught with their pants down.
by Dave Mitchell, IT PRO
London,England,UK
“The Verdict: 5 Stars: Regulatory compliance isn’t just about protecting databases but also about having laid down reporting and data access auditing procedures that can be enforced. Guardium is capable of ensuring consistent practices can be maintained across multiple databases and provides the tools to safeguard them and ensure their integrity.”
“With database attacks on the increase Guardium can make sure businesses don’t get caught with their pants down. Businesses have a legal obligation to protect personal and sensitive information in their databases and yet it is truly stunning how many are still failing to comply with regulatory guidelines. It’s now a well known fact that SQL injection attacks are increasing massively thanks to freely available hacker kits and this year has started with security company Kasperksy ironically having one of its customer databases hacked into.”
“There’s certainly no shortage of database security products on the market and Guardium has traditionally offered an impressive array of defences against these types of attacks and more. Deployed as a well specified Dell PowerEdge 1950 appliance, it provides database monitoring and auditing plus security policy enforcement for blocking unauthorised access.”
“SQL server attacks abounded last year, evidenced in the Test Center’s threat reports of 2008. A relentless amount of SQL hacking attempts were logged as well. Compromised databases accounted for many of the big computer security breach news stories in 2008. This is why a lot of companies are turning to database security solutions like Guardium ... [which] may contain the most powerful compliance regulations tools that the Test Center has ever seen.”
Guardium has been named a Red Herring 100 North America winner, a selection of the 100 most innovative private technology companies in North America. The magazine’s editorial board identified the top 100 out of more than 1,500 closely evaluated companies that are leading the next wave of IT innovation. Previous award winners include Google, Yahoo!, Skype, Netscape, Salesforce.com, and YouTube.
According to Forrester, Guardium is “A Leader across the board” with “dominance and momentum on its side (Forrester Wave: Enterprise Database Auditing And Real-Time Protection, Q4 2007, October 2007). In its comprehensive assessment, Forrester evaluated 14 large and small vendors across 116 criteria, with Guardium earning the #1 score for Architecture and the highest overall scores for Current Offering, Product Strategy, and Corporate Strategy. Forrester expects Guardium to “maintain its leadership in supporting large heterogeneous environments, delivering high performance and scalability, simplifying administration, and performing real-time database protection.”
Guardium was named a finalist for the Reader’s Trust Award for Best Intellectual Property Protection. Guardium is the only database security company selected as a finalist by SC Magazine readers. Placement in the SC Magazine Awards program is based on voting by more than 9,000 of the publication’s readers who are responsible for IT security, compliance and risk management in organizations worldwide.
SC Magazine gave Guardium 5-Star ratings for Features, Performance and Ease-of-Use, citing its “easy installation, massive database support, sophisticated reporting, strong policy-based security [and] PCI out-of-the-box.” The review described the product as a “sophisticated database security solution that is simple to install and deploy” with “an extensive range of security features that allow companies to monitor and audit database usage and enforce policies to prevent unauthorized access.”
Guardium was rated “at the top of the DBEP [database extrusion prevention] class” with a “solid feature set that should please security pros looking to take back control of database security” in a lab review conducted by InformationWeek magazine. According to the review, Guardium “has thrown in practically every feature you’ll need to lock down sensitive data” with a “well-designed and attractive Web interface that shows off the maturity of the 6.0 release.” The review concludes that Guardium 6.0 provides “capabilities that stand out from other products we’ve tested.” These products include Imperva’s SecureSphere Database Security Gateway and RippleTech’s Informant.
The Verdict: Guardium’s solution “has evolved from an impressive technology to an enterprise-class security product that should be on every organization’s radar.” Guardium “continues to address one of the most typical database audit failure points. Most auditors will not issue a ‘pass’ if you leverage a database’s native logging features because they are owned and controlled by the groups you are trying to monitor (for example, DBAs should not be responsible for configuring and monitoring DBAs). Guardium 6.0 ensures a system of checks and balances between the security and database engineering teams.”
“This year’s Auditing and Compliance category Gold Winner, Guardium Data Privacy Accelerator, an add-on to the company’s SQL Guard compliance solution, provides auditing with an eye toward protecting sensitive data against theft, including data breaches by privileged users inside an organization. Data Privacy Accelerator gives organizations an edge on not only preventing data breaches, but also on stopping them in real time.”
Bank Technology News named Guardium ”one of 10 technology companies to watch”, stating that the company’s “innovation is getting them noticed” and that Guardium is “in the right place at the right time with the right partners.” Past winners of this prestigious award have included Oracle and RSA, The Security Division of EMC. The publication notes that ING Investment Management is one of Guardium’s customers, while citing Guardium’s “top talent, led by chief technology officer Ron Bennatan, who’s developed apps for J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch, [AT&T Bell Laboratories] and Intel.”
Guardium was named a finalist for the prestigious 2008 American Business Awards in the category of “Best New Product or Service - Computer Software.” Guardium 6 was one of more than 2,600 nominations spanning 40+ categories. Other finalists include: Microsoft; Adobe Systems; Citrix Online; salesforce.com; and WebEx Communications. Hailed as “the business world’s own Oscars” (New York Post, April 27, 2005), The American Business Awards are the only national, all-encompassing awards program honoring great performances in business.
By Noel Yuhanna, Principal Anyalyst, Forrester Research
SQL injection attacks and internal data thefts are on the rise – but DBAs spend less than 5% of their time on database security.
Read “Your Enterprise Database Security Strategy for 2010”, authored by Noel Yuhanna, principal analyst at Forrester Research Inc., to learn:
by Jon Oltsik, Principal Analyst, Enterprise Strategy Group
In a recent Research Brief, ESG analyzed the current state of database security. Based upon a survey of 179 North American-based security professionals working at organizations with over 1,000 employees, ESG found that:
This Research Brief categorizes databases as a “dangerous and growing security gap,” and offers steps to improve database security across the enterprise.
According to Forrester, Guardium is “a Leader across the board” with “dominance and momentum on its side.” Forrester expects Guardium to “maintain its leadership in supporting large heterogeneous environments, delivering high performance and scalability, simplifying administration, and performing real-time database protection.”
This commissioned case study by Forrester Consulting describes how a global manufacturer implemented Guardium’s real-time monitoring technology to protect corporate data and enforce change controls for critical databases supporting SAP, Siebel and 22 other key financial systems. The customer is a Fortune 500 manufacturer whose brands are household names around the world. According to Forrester, the Guardium solution delivered a risk-adjusted ROI of 239 percent and payback period of less than 6 months compared to the “significant labor and capital costs” that would have otherwise been required using an in-house solution and traditional database logging utilities.
The latest survey commissioned by the Oracle Applications Users Group (OAUG), the leading Oracle user group, in cooperation with Guardium, finds that IT organizations are devoting major amounts of staff resources to database monitoring and compliance reporting. Discover what other businesses are saying about compliance challenges and costs, automating database monitoring and auditing, and the benefits and opportunities that lie ahead.
by Eric Ogren, Security Analyst, Enterprise Strategy Group
This special report, commissioned by Guardium, examines a comprehensive approach to securing confidential data and auditing database activity for compliance with government regulations and corporate security policies. The purpose is to provide information and make recommendations for database security to assure true compliance and business continuity. Information in this report derives from Enterprise Strategy Group research and interviews with security executives of global operations.
by Spire Research
This white paper talks about how to protect your valuable and sensitive databases. Safeguarding information assets is vital, yet it can be difficult to apply controls that are restrictive or inhibit performance. Learn more about the traditional issues surrounding database security, an approach to implement a database security monitoring program, and insights into how Guardium addresses the challenges of security and compliance with its powerful solutions.
Waltham, Mass.-based Guardium received a strategic investment from Cisco as part of a strategic funding round totaling $6.3 million. Cisco’s investment in the four year old company is the first investment in this market by a major technology company and provides strong validation of Guardium’s market leadership and the new database access control product category that provides companies with the ability to track and control access to sensitive data in their critical business systems and ensure regulatory compliance. Cisco, for a relatively small investment, gains access to new technology which may help drive Cisco revenue in the future as the company expands and refines product offerings.
Top Data Protection Professionals from Deloitte & Touche LLP, ING Americas Financial Services and Leading Analyst Firm Address Compliance Issues Including Cost and Complexity
March 1 - 4, 2010
Moscone Center,
San Francisco, CA
The RSA® Conference 2010 is your information security event! As the information security field continues to grow in importance and influence, RSA® Conference plays an integral role in educating and connecting security professionals across the globe.
Exhibits:
Guardium Booth # 632 - South Hall
IBM Booth # 1316 - South Hall
Session:
Come meet Ron Ben Natan, Guardium’s CTO, who will be the featured speaker in a session entitled the “HOWTO Secure and Audit Oracle 10g and 11g”
Data Security Track: DAS-203
10:40–11:50 am.
Wednesday, March 3
Register for a complimentary exhibit hall only pass by using the Guardium code # EC10GDM. Click Here for RSA Registration Page. Offer good until February 26, 2010.
March 16 - 17, 2010
JW Marriott,
Washington, DC
Information Security Forums bring together experienced IT and information security practitioners for confidential information sharing on the industry’s most important issues, technologies, and trends. The two-day event includes keynote addresses, peer-to-peer technical and strategic roundtable discussions led by IANS’ Faculty, and was inspired by the Harvard Business School teaching method.
Date: March 25, 2010
Time: 2:00 PM ET
Duration: 60-minutes
If your SAP, Oracle Financials, PeopleSoft or product design system were breached by cybercriminals with compromised superuser credentials – would you know? And could you prove it to your auditors?
A recent Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) survey found that nearly 75% of security professionals expect database attacks to increase in the future.
Join Jon Oltsik, ESG Principal Analyst, to learn about best practices and what your peers are saying about database security:
Phil Neray, VP of Security Strategy for Guardium, an IBM Company, will present case studies about enterprises that have implemented Guardium’s automated, cross-DBMS solution to secure sensitive data and reduce compliance costs.
Check out this educational webcast to learn HOWTO mitigate internal and external database threats.
April 27 - 29, 2010
Earls Court,
London, UK
Visit Guardium at Stand L40
Engage and participate in the unrivalled free education programme where influential global experts stimulate debate and industry practitioners share case study experiences. Enjoy the vibrant atmosphere whilst meeting international solution providers who showcase current and emerging technologies on the showfloor and deliver practical, professional & technical expertise enabling you to solve your information security business challenges.
May 4 - 5, 2010
Information Security Forums bring together experienced IT and information security practitioners for confidential information sharing on the industry’s most important issues, technologies, and trends. The two-day event includes keynote addresses, peer-to-peer technical and strategic roundtable discussions led by IANS’ Faculty, and was inspired by the Harvard Business School teaching method.
May 19 - 21, 2010
Marriott Park Hotel
Rome, Italy
The IBM IOD EMEA Conference is the industry-leading event on information-led transformation in Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA). This Conference offers you an agenda that’s bursting with sessions, demos, networking events, and more-all geared to making your organisation achieve optimal business results.